Scott is trying to introduce oral evidence in court to alter the terms of a written contract he had with Bonnie. Bonnie has raised the parole evidence rule as an objection to Scott's testimony. In which of the following circumstances will Scott be able to introduce the oral evidence?

Scott claims that he was defrauded into entering into the contract and wants to testify about the intentional misrepresentations of material facts.

The oral evidence is introduced to clarify the meaning of an ambiguous term used in the written contract.

There was a mutual mistake of a material fact when the contract was entered into.

The court will likely allow Scott to introduce oral evidence in each of these sitations.