Scott v. HarrisandPlumhoffv.Rickardare two cases decided by the the U.S. Supreme Court in which we have video evidence of the actions police officers took in each instance. The video from theScott v. Harriscase was actually viewedbythe Justices and made a part of the decision, which was a first for the Court. Based on your reading of the two cases and viewing of the two videos (found in the Videos folder) do you believe the actions of the officers inPlumhoffwere justified? In answering this question you either agree or disagree with the U.S.Supreme Court's analysis so state your reasons for your agreement ordisagreement with the Court. What factors are persuasive to help you reach your decision? Lastly, is the matter one that should have gone to the jury to decide or do you see it as purely a legal question as the Court did?