Securify, a security company, placed a job advertisement on its website and its social media accounts looking for new employees. The advertisement also requires prospective applicants to solve series of puzzles and to circumvent some hypothetical security measures to test their ability and skills and if they could do so within the time given, they will be rewarded a cash prize of RM5,000 and be recruited by Securify. To show its sincerity in the matter, Securify had deposited the cash prize with a local bank and the winner will be guaranteed a lucrative job in the company. Kelly, who was in-between jobs, saw the advertisement and she successfully did all that was required by the advertisement and wanted to claim the cash prize and the job position. However, Securify refused to give her the reward and the job position was already fulfilled by an experienced engineer. Securify claimed that the advertisement was merely a gimmick or a marketing stunt and it was never meant to be taken seriously or to be considered as a legally binding offer. With reference to the Contracts Act 1950 and decided cases

1) Advise Kelly whether she can claim the cash prize and the job position from Securify. (10 marks)