See the "Zane Corbin, Accounting Major" case for this question.

Again, assume you were a member of the five-person panel appointed to review the charge of academic misconduct filed against Zane Corbin. What questions would you have posed to Zane, Professor Herrick, and Professor Goggans during their testimony before the panel? How, if at all, might the answers to those questions have affected your vote at the conclusion of the hearing?