Selene has just set up her business, PRONTO VISAS! She is a sole trader and has hired a clerical assistant, Terry. Her first client has contacted the office seeking assistance. Terry tells Selene about the client, Claudette. She has been trying to help her son Pierre, aged 26, come to Australia. Pierre sought advice from an agent, Shifty, who ran a business called Le Agency, in Marseille, France. Shifty charged Pierre 5000 to fill in the forms for a visa to come to Australia on a Child (101) visa. When Pierre was interviewed by Department of Immigration officers in Paris, they discovered he had actually been working full time for the past 5 years. As a result, Pierre did not fit the definition of dependent child and the application was rejected. Claudette says that Pierre had told Shifty he had been working. Terry tells Selene that he said to Claudette that Shifty obviously did not know how to give proper immigration advice. Terry tells Selene that when Claudette told her how much money Pierre had, Terry remarked to Claudette that Pierre would have to have a good chance at coming to Australia on a Business visa as an Investor. Claudette wants to come in for an appointment to discuss Pierre's options and to discuss on what basis she could make a complaint about Shifty. Consider what provisions of the Migration Act 1958 and the Migration (Migration Agents Code of Conduct) Regulations 2021 have been breached and if so what are the possible consequences? Please note that you are