Seller, a citizen of Seattle Washington, and Byer, a citizen of Boston, Massachusetts, met in Boston and signed a written contract by which Seller agreed to sell Whiteacre, located in the State of Wyoming. The contract as written provided that the purchase price of Whiteacre was $185,000. Seller returned to Seattle and sent Byer a deed conveying good title to Whiteacre. Byer did not send Seller any money, but brought an action against Seller for reformation of the contract to correct an alleged error in the contract price. Byer, alleged that the agreed price was $85,000 and that the $185,000 figure in the contract was a typographical error. The action was brought in a federal district court in Boston, Massachusetts. Subject matter jurisdiction was based on diversity. Personal jurisdiction over Seller was based on service of process under Massachusetts's long-arm statute. Seller moved to dismiss the action, alleging lack of both personal and subject matter jurisdiction. The Motion was denied. Was the court correct? Discuss. PPlease write an irac answer to the hypothetical. You do need to address both personal and subject matter jurisdiction