Seminar question #1 Please consider the following scenario: The Republic of Stankonia, which is an EU Member State, has enacted public law X5641 in 2010, granting the firm "Dirty Dollars\" the country's only license to offer lottery and gambling services. Part of this license is the option to hand out sub-licenses to other firms, in which Dirty Dollars is free to set prices and conditions of the sub-license. Two firms, "So Fresh" and "So Clean" have successfully applied for such sub-licenses in sports betting in 2012, holding a combined market share of 10% opposed to the 90% market share of Dirty Dollar's sports betting subsidiary \"Players Ball. \" In 2016 Dirty Dollars gets a new CEO, ms. Jackson, who is tasked with generating more revenue. Ms. Jackson decides to increase the advertising budget for Players Ball in 2017, in order to attract more consumers. Consequently, as of 2018 the market share of So Fresh and 80 Clean has shrunk to 5%. So Clean decides to file a complaint with the European Commission for infringement of art. 106.1 in conjunction with art. 102 TFEU. You work at DG COMP, and the complaint of So Clean lands on your desk. Assess the merits of this complaint using relevant CJEU case law and advise your manager on how to proceed with this complaint