Setting Standards, Calculating and Using Variances Leather Works is a family-owned maker of leather travel bags and briefcases located in the northeastern part of the United States. Foreign competition has forced its owner, Heather Gray, to explore new ways to meet the competition. One of her cousins, Wallace Hayes, who recently graduated from college with a major in accounting, told her about the use of cost variance analysis to learn about efficiencies of production. In May of last year, Heather asked Matt Jones, chief accountant, and Alfred Prudest, production manager, to implement a standard costing system. Matt and Alfred, in turn, retained Shannon Leikam, an accounting professor at Hardings College, to set up a standard costing system by using information supplied to her by Matts and Alfreds staff. To verify that the information was accurate, Shannon visited the plant and measured workers output using time and motion studies. During those visits, she was not accompanied by either Matt or Alfred, and the workers knew about Shannons schedule in advance. The cost system was implemented in June of last year. Recently, the following dialogue took place among Heather, Matt, and Alfred: HEATHER: How is the business performing? ALFRED: You know, we are producing a lot more than we used to, thanks to the contract that you helped obtain from Lean, Inc., for laptop covers. (Lean is a national supplier of computer accessories.) MATT: Thank goodness for that new product. It has kept us from sinking even more due to the inroads into our business made by those foreign suppliers of leather goods. HEATHER: What about the standard costing system? MATT: The variances are mostly favorable, except for the first few months when the supplier of leather started charging more. HEATHER: How did the union members take to the standards? ALFRED: Not bad. They grumbled a bit at first, but they have taken it in stride. We've consistently shown favorable direct labor efficiency variances and direct materials usage variances. The direct labor rate variance has been flat. MATT: It should be since direct labor rates are negotiated by the union representative at the start of the year and remain the same for the entire year. HEATHER: Matt, would you send me the variance report for laptop covers immediately? The following chart summarizes the direct materials and direct labor variances from November of last year through April of this year (extracted from the report provided by Matt). Standards for each laptop cover are as follows: Three feet of direct materials at $7.50 per foot. Forty-five minutes of direct labor at $14 per hour. Month Actual Cost (Direct Materials + Direct Labor) Direct Materials Price Variance Direct Materials Efficiency Variance Direct Labor Rate Variance Direct Labor Efficiency Variance November $150,000 $10,000 U $5,000 F $100 U $5,000 F December 155,000 11,000 U 5,200 F 110 U 6,500 F January 152,000 10,100 U 4,900 F 105 U 7,750 F February 151,000 9,900 U 4,500 F 95 U 6,950 F March 125,000 9,000 U 3,000 F 90 U 8,200 F April 115,000 8,000 U 2,000 F 90 U 8,500 F In addition, the data for May of this year, but not the variances for the month, are as follows: Laptop covers made in May 2,900 units Total actual direct materials costs incurred $ 68,850 Actual quantity of direct materials purchased and used 8,500 feet Total actual direct labor cost incurred $ 25,910 Total actual direct labor hours 1,837.6 hours Actual direct labor cost per hour exceeded the budgeted rate by $0.10 per hour. Required: For May of this year, calculate the price and quantity variances for direct labor and direct materials. Round intermediate calculations and final answers to two decimal places. MPV $ fill in the blank 1 MUV $ fill in the blank 3 LRV $ fill in the blank 5 LEV $ fill in the blank 7