Seventeen$-$year$-$old Charles Edward Smith bought a car from Bobby Floars Toyota. Smith made $11$ monthly payments on the car, of which $10$ were made after he turned $18.$ He then took the car back to Floars. The car was sold, but for less than Smith owed on it and Floars sued him for the difference. Smith claimed that returning the car $10$ months after reaching his majority constituted a timely dissaffirmance of the contract. What do you think the court should find?