Question
Several months ago, Ayers Industries Inc. experienced a hazardous materials spill at one of its plants. As a result, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fined
Several months ago, Ayers Industries Inc. experienced a hazardous materials spill at one of its plants. As a result, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fined the company $240,000. The company is contesting the fine. In addition, an employee is seeking $220,000 in damages related to the spill. Lastly, a homeowner has sued the company for $310,000. The homeowner lives 35 miles from the plant but believes that the incident has reduced the homes resale value by $310,000.
Ayers legal counsel believes that it is probable that the EPA fine will stand. In addition, counsel indicates that an out-of-court settlement of $125,000 has recently been reached with the employee. The final papers will be signed next week. Counsel believes that the homeowners case is much weaker and will be decided in favor of Ayers. Other litigation related to the spill is possible, but the damage amounts are uncertain.
Required: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A. | On December 31, journalize the contingent liabilities associated with the hazardous materials spill. Use the account Damage Awards and Fines to recognize the expense for the period. Refer to the Chart of Accounts for exact wording of account titles. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B. Prepare a note disclosure relating to this incident. The company experienced a hazardous materials spill at one of its plants during the previous period. This spill has resulted in a number of lawsuits to which the company is a party. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has fined the company selector 1 $530,000 $240,000 $125,000 $365,000 , which the company is contesting in court. Although the company selector 2 does does not admit fault, legal counsel believes that the fine payment is selector 3 remote probable reasonably possible . In addition, an employee has sued the company. A selector 4 $125,000 $365,000 $240,000 $530,000 out-of-court settlement has been reached with the employee. The EPA fine and out-of-court settlement have been recognized as selector 5 revenue an expense a current asset for the period. There is one other outstanding lawsuit related to this incident. Counsel selector 6 does does not believe that the lawsuit has merit. Other lawsuits and unknown liabilities may arise from this incident. Points: Feedback Check My Work Explanation
|
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started