Should diminished capacity be allowed asa defense to a contract if the diminished capacity was intentionally induced?Should there be a different result if the substance is alcohol-recreational drugs-prescription medication?What about if the alcohol was provided for free at a casino and the patron keptpurchasing"markers" (borrowing money from the casino in order to keep gambling) as he was being served free drinks by the server? If the patron later claimed intoxication as a defense and refused to pay the markers, how should the case be decided?