Similar to Medina's argument that prescribed fire can reduce wildfire damages these are very risky. Jollon and Houlton argue that wildfires, though some may originate from climate change or those that are provoked, have not alleviated the statistics of damage in wildfires. Both believe that in their search for a solution and their desire to mitigate wildfire damage, their implementation carries risks. For example, when speaking of prescribed burning and considering risks to the environment, this question is raised: How can the risks associated with prescribed burning be managed effectively and ensure benefits and reduce potential harm? Generete a topic sentce on the paragrph about climate change and human activity