Single plantwide rate and activity-based costing

Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) conducted an activity-based costing study of its Evansville, Indiana, plant in order to identify its most profitable products. Assume that we select three representative refrigerators (out of 333): one low-, one medium-, and one high-volume refrigerator. Additionally, we assume the following activity-base information for each of the three refrigerators:

Three Representative Refrigerators	Number of Machine Hours	Number of Setups	Number of Sales Orders	Number of Units
RefrigeratorLow Volume	24	14	38	160
RefrigeratorMedium Volume	225	13	88	1,500
RefrigeratorHigh Volume	900	9	120	6,000

Prior to conducting the study, the factory overhead allocation was based on a single machine hour rate. The machine hour rate was $200 per hour. After conducting the activity-based costing study, assume that three activities were used to allocate the factory overhead. The new activity rate information is assumed to be as follows:

Line Item Description	Machining Activity	Setup Activity	Sales Order Processing Activity
Activity rate	$160	$240	$55

a. Complete the following table, using the single machine hour rate to determine the per-unit factory overhead for each refrigerator (Column A) and the three activity-based rates to determine the activity-based factory overhead per unit (Column B). Finally, compute the percent change in per-unit allocation from the single to activity-based rate methods (Column C).

If required, round all per unit answers to the nearest cent. Round percents to one decimal place. For column C, use the minus sign to indicate a negative or decrease.

Product Volume Class	Column A Single Rate Overhead Allocation Per Unit	Column B ABC Overhead Allocation Per Unit	Column C Percent Change in Allocation
Low			%
Medium			%
High			%