sisek A is it possible that most investors might regard Stock B as being less risky than Stock A ? 1. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolio sense. It. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. III. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. W. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolo sense. V. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock. A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. c. Assume the risk-free rate is 4.5%. What are the 5 harpe ratios for Stocks A and B ? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to four decimal places. Stock A: 5tock B: Are these calculations consistent with the information obtained from the coefficient of variation calculations in Part b? 1. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If 5 tock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a thigher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a partfolio sense. It. In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky then B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. III. In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky than B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, an hence be more risky in a portfalio sense. IV. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolio sense. V. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If 5tock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfollo sense. Is it posesie that thist investes migtit regard thtock 1 at beng iest rivy than 5 teck A? 1. If stock 8 a west highly correiated with the market than A, then it miget have a higher beta than 5 tock A, and hence be more risiky in a portfolo sense 14. If Sthck \& is - pre tughly cerrelated with the market than A, then it might have a hightr bete thas stock A, and hence be less risky in a portate sente. W. 1e sisek ti is mere highy cerrelated with the market than A. then it might have the same beta as 5 tock A, and hence be pust as riaky in a pertfalio senie. stan621 herce be more ritery in a portote sence. 1. If Stock B a less highly coerelated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than 5 tock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolie sense. II. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolie serse. IIt. If Stock 8 is more highly correigted with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than 5 tock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. TW. If Stock 6 is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolis sense. N. If 5aock B is itss highly correlated with the market than A, then it might heve a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less nisky in a pertfolo sense. teckA Stock Bi Are these cakculations consivent with the infermation obtained from the coefficent of variatisa calculations in Part b? 1. In a stand alone ritk sense A is iess risky thas B. H stock 8 is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence b1-mare nisky in a portfollo sense. It, In a stand-aione risk sense A is more risky than B, If 5 teck B is less Nighly cerrelated woth the market than A, then it might have a lower beta then stock A, and hence be iess ritky in a portfolio sense. III. In a stand-aione risk sense A is more risky than B. If stock B is less Nighly correiated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than 5 teock A, and fience be more risky in a portfolio sense. IV. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then is might have the same beta as stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolio sense. V. In e thand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock a is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be iess risky in a portfolle sense. sisek A is it possible that most investors might regard Stock B as being less risky than Stock A ? 1. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolio sense. It. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. III. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. W. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolo sense. V. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock. A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. c. Assume the risk-free rate is 4.5%. What are the 5 harpe ratios for Stocks A and B ? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to four decimal places. Stock A: 5tock B: Are these calculations consistent with the information obtained from the coefficient of variation calculations in Part b? 1. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If 5 tock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a thigher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a partfolio sense. It. In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky then B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. III. In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky than B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, an hence be more risky in a portfalio sense. IV. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolio sense. V. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If 5tock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfollo sense. Is it posesie that thist investes migtit regard thtock 1 at beng iest rivy than 5 teck A? 1. If stock 8 a west highly correiated with the market than A, then it miget have a higher beta than 5 tock A, and hence be more risiky in a portfolo sense 14. If Sthck \& is - pre tughly cerrelated with the market than A, then it might have a hightr bete thas stock A, and hence be less risky in a portate sente. W. 1e sisek ti is mere highy cerrelated with the market than A. then it might have the same beta as 5 tock A, and hence be pust as riaky in a pertfalio senie. stan621 herce be more ritery in a portote sence. 1. If Stock B a less highly coerelated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than 5 tock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolie sense. II. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolie serse. IIt. If Stock 8 is more highly correigted with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than 5 tock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense. TW. If Stock 6 is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolis sense. N. If 5aock B is itss highly correlated with the market than A, then it might heve a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less nisky in a pertfolo sense. teckA Stock Bi Are these cakculations consivent with the infermation obtained from the coefficent of variatisa calculations in Part b? 1. In a stand alone ritk sense A is iess risky thas B. H stock 8 is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence b1-mare nisky in a portfollo sense. It, In a stand-aione risk sense A is more risky than B, If 5 teck B is less Nighly cerrelated woth the market than A, then it might have a lower beta then stock A, and hence be iess ritky in a portfolio sense. III. In a stand-aione risk sense A is more risky than B. If stock B is less Nighly correiated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than 5 teock A, and fience be more risky in a portfolio sense. IV. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then is might have the same beta as stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolio sense. V. In e thand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock a is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be iess risky in a portfolle sense