Situation analysis Give some background information about the organization, what they do and their business model. Begin by describing briefly what is transpiring in this case. Introduce the main people in the case and discuss how they are related to what is transpiring. Answer the following questions Problem Analysis Should Neil have agreed to meet Paul Joseph, RIPCLs representative? Why or why not? What are the implications of Neils decision? Is this predicament problematic? If so, how? Include a discussion of which, if any, of the principles of corporate governance (noted in the case) have been violated or followed in this case. Alternative solutions What should Neil do? Give two possible solutions that Neil could take regarding the information he obtained from his meeting with Paul? What are the implications for each? Give some pros and cons. Recommended Solution Which of the two solutions presented above do you think will work best? Discuss why. Support your discussion by using one concept in a citation from our assigned readings this week. When citing from our materials please observe the following: use APA format, include a full explanation of the concept that you are referencing, make sure that it is clear how it applies to this situation