Sixteen year old Marsha signs a written contract for the purchase of a car from Joss Motors of La Grande for $3500. She uses the car to drive back and forth to her job at Burger Bell in Pendleton. A year after the purchase, the car's engine blows up. Marsha calls up Joss Motors and tells them to send her money back. She decided she does not want the car. Joss refuses and Marsha sues to rescind the contract. A court will most likely: A. Enforce the contract because Marsha impliedly ratified the contract by driving the car for a year. B. Enforce the contract if Marsha looked 18 at the time she entered into the contract. C. Not enforce the contract because Marsha can disaffirm her contractual obligations. D. Not enforce the contract because it violated the Statute of Frauds. Matt has an expensive stereo in his car which he enjoys playing at full volume. Matt's mother is worried that Matt is going to damage his hearing from listening to loud music so she offers to pay him $300 if he refrains from listening to loud music for the next three months. Matt accepts her offer and after three months without listening to any music he tries to collect the money from his mother. She refuses to pay and he sues for breach of contract. Which of the following is true? A. Mother can effectively assert the defense of undue influence. B. A contract was not created because Matt did not give any consideration. C. If Matt is a minor, Mother will not have to perform her obligations. D. The parties have formed a valid unilateral contract. An offeror's intent to be bound to an offer is determined by: A. the offeree's ratification of the statement. B. how a reasonable person would interpret the offeror's statement. C. the subjective belief of the parties. D. the type of consideration being offered. Bob and Andy enter into a contract which states the following: "Bob agrees to sell Andy his house at Blue Lake for $10,000." Andy has given Bob the $10,000 but Bob has yet to transfer title to the property to Andy. Which of the following is false? A. The common law of contracts applies to the contract. B. The parties have entered into a collateral contract. C. The contract is executory. D. The statute of frauds requires the contract to be written. Kim and Jeff went to college together at E.O.U. Kim moves to Portland after graduation and Jeff remains in La Grande. Kim starts a successful business and during a telephone conference tells Jeff that she is shorthanded and would pay him union scale if he came to work for her. Jeff quits his job in La Grande, rents a U-Haul and moves to Portland. However, when he shows up at Kim's office, she informs him that she just lost a major customer and cannot hire any new employees at present. Jeff sues to enforce their agreement. A court will most likely hold that the agreement: A. was unenforceable because of the parole evidence rule. B. was unenforceable because it was not put into writing. C. was enforceable under the U.C.C. D. was enforceable based on promissory estoppel. Sarah and Mike enter into a contract in which Mike agrees to pay Sarah $100 for her watch. Mike's subsequent transfer of his right to receive the watch to his brother, Fred, is known as: A. a delegation B. an assignment C. a novation D. a quasi-contract The ____________ requires that certain types of contracts be written to be enforceable. A. Statute of Frauds B. Notary Act C. Parole Evidence Rule D. Mailbox Rule