so the landmark case of New York Times v. Sullivan established that a plaintiff suing for libel would need to prove actual malice if that plaintiff is a public figure or public official. And in the Sullivan case the Times was sued because it published a paid advertisement that another party wrote and created. That ad contained some errors of fact. The Supreme Court's ruling established that the Times would have had to have exercised actual malice to be held responsible for a libel verdict; that is, it would have had to know it was publishing false material or would have had to recklessly disregarded whether it was false. In this article about Netflix athttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-features/netflix-suits-streaming-1235040681/it describes that Netflix is the target of defamation lawsuits because some plaintiffs dispute the accuracy of material in some of its movies. These movies are generally produced by production companies from which Netflix buys the film for display on the streaming outlet. Given what I wrote my question is what's at stake in this article and why?