Social Media Blocking Can social media platforms like Twitter block or remove posts by particular people, based on the person's viewpoint Generally, media companies are free to publish only material of their choosing Media companies routinely restrict the content they wish to publish In fact, the First Amendment protects their right to do so Since they are not governmental entities, the First Amendment does not restrict their efforts to limit content that appears in their apps However, social media is often seen as being different in kind from traditional media, and even other forms of internet media Texas enacted a law in 2020, HB 20 HB 20 was enacted by the Texas legislature and signed into law by its governor in response to Twitter's blocking of then President Trump in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 attack on the U S Capitol The law prohibits social media platforms from blocking or removing posts based on the speaker's viewpoint The law was upheld in a split decision by the U S Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in September 2022 and is likely headed to the U S Supreme Court That means that the Fifth Circuit's decision by no means settles the issue Introduction Identify the issue about which you are writing Provide a brief description about the competing points of view and a summary of your conclusions Background Describe the issue why is this an issue that at least some people believe requires a legal remedy What are the facts underlying the issue State of the Law what is the current state of the law regarding your issue Do courts agree on the way in which this issue should be resolved Have other positions and or solutions to the particular problem been proposed or adopted For example, proposed or pending legislation or litigation If so, what are they Analysis Assess the competing viewpoints Do the assumptions and points of view underlying them hold up to analysis Conclusion this should be a half page or so that summarized your paper Describe the issue why do Twitter and other social media platforms remove content posted by particular political speakers What is the current state of affairs concerning this issue Have other states adopted similar measures Research, identify and discuss the major positions for and against allowing social media sites to restrict the content placed on them by members of the public How do social media platforms justify those actions Why do proponents of such measures feel that social media companies should be treated differently than other kinds of media Evaluate the competing positions Do the assumptions and points of view underlying them hold up to analysis

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 11, 2024

Social Media Blocking Can social-media platforms like Twitter block or remove posts by particular people, based on the person's viewpoint? Generally, media companies are free

Social Media Blocking

Can social-media platforms like Twitter block or remove posts by particular people, based on the person's viewpoint? Generally, media companies are free to publish only material of their choosing. Media companies routinely restrict the content they wish to publish. In fact, the First Amendment protects their right to do so. Since they are not governmental entities, the First Amendment does not restrict their efforts to limit content that appears in their apps. However, social media is often seen as being different in kind from traditional media, and even other forms of internet media. Texas enacted a law in 2020, HB 20. HB 20 was enacted by the Texas legislature and signed into law by its governor in response to Twitter's blocking of then-President Trump in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. The law prohibits social-media platforms from blocking or removing posts based on the speaker's viewpoint. The law was upheld in a split decision by the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in September 2022 and is likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. That means that the Fifth Circuit's decision by no means settles the issue.

Introduction
1. Identify the issue about which you are writing
2. Provide a brief description about the competing points of view and a summary of your conclusions.
Background: Describe the issue; why is this an issue that at least some people believe requires a legal remedy? What are the facts underlying the issue?
State of the Law:
1. what is the current state of the law regarding your issue?
2. Do courts agree on the way in which this issue should be resolved? Have other positions and/or solutions to the particular problem been proposed or adopted? For example, proposed or pending legislation or litigation. If so, what are they?
Analysis: Assess the competing viewpoints. Do the assumptions and points of view underlying them hold up to analysis?
Conclusion: this should be a half page or so that summarized your paper.

Describe the issue: why do Twitter and other social media platforms remove content posted by particular political speakers? What is the current state of affairs concerning this issue? Have other states adopted similar measures?
Research, identify and discuss the major positions for and against allowing social media sites to restrict the content placed on them by members of the public. How do social media platforms justify those actions? Why do proponents of such measures feel that social media companies should be treated differently than other kinds of media?
Evaluate the competing positions. Do the assumptions and points of view underlying them hold up to analysis