Sogg v. Nevada State Bank, 108 Nev. 308, 832 P.2d 781 (1992). This case has one of the most colorful fact patterns you will ever read. It takes the language of the statute and expands and provides clarification, therefore it is a good illustration of how a statute and case can work together. 1. As you read it, explain how this case gives other subsequent courts guidance on how to apply NRS 123A.080 and evaluate the validity of a pre-marital agreement. 2. Do you think it clears up the vagueness presented in the statute?