Solve.
Be sure you have read Chapters 2. 3, and 4 and listened to the Professors' PPT presentations for each chapter. Also, be sure you have watched the supplemental video on "Applying the Ethical Decision-Making framework\" (it gives tips for this assignment). Read the article "The Man Who Blew the Whistle on Halliburton" by Eisinger (2015) available here i, . (Note: As the article is no longer available in open access fmm the Atlantic website, We are sharing with you a pdf version here for the purpose of completing this assignment. Please do not distribute it further). Read through the paragraph starting with the sentence "The repercussions of being outed in the email were immediate.'l (Do not do any outside research, use ONLY this article for your analysis), Analyze the case discussed in the article carefully using the ethical philosophical frameworks and the ethical decision-making process presented in Chapters 2 and 3 (both readings and Professor presentations) for Questions 1~3. Use the readings and Professor presentation on Chapter4 to answer question 4. 1. ~Analyze and write up steps 1-4 on the ethical decision-making framework (use the provided template). Be sure to thoroughly complete each step. NOTE: you are asked to identify the dilemmais) from Tony's perspective (e.i., what major ethical choice(s) did he face?). 2. Analyze Tony's dilemma and think through step 5 with rst framework per the provided template. 3. Analyze Tony's dilemma and think through step 5 with the second framework per the provided template. 4. Recommendations & implementation based on the insights from Chapter 4 (Go ahead and read the rest of the article at this point): How did Tony's values seem to be different than the prevailing culture at Halliburton? What steps would you take as the Halliburton's CEO to design systems that both encourage ethical behavior and prevent unethical behavior? Back up your response with what you learned about compliance-based and value-based culture from Chapter 4. Each of your responses should be AT LEAST 1 fully developed paragraph (68 sentences in length minimum). Recall this assignment is being evaluated for BOTH your application of the concepts AND your writing ability. See the grading rubric attached in the assignment so you are fully aware of the expectations. FORMAT: Use the TEMPLATE provided below. Each paragraph will be 6~8 sentences (Minimum) in length integrating concepts from your reading and outside sources to support your responsets). Your paper should be written in proper APA format with intext citations. Times New Roman or Arial, size 12 font, double spaced, with in- text citations (text or article) and include a Reference page. Submit your well formatted. fully proofread response as an attachment to the Assignment link in Canvas by the date/time given in your course syliabus. Acceptable formats are .410: or .docx). Name your document: Last Name_ethical_di|emma_analysis Halliburton Ethical Dilemma Analysis Template Revised_FlNAL.docx J: (Required Template)
