Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Solve the following financial statements kindly? Annette Pachelo recently opened her own law office on March ?1, which she operates as a corporation. The name

Solve the following financial statements kindly?

Annette Pachelo recently opened her own law office on March ?1, which she operates as a corporation. The name of the new entity is Annette Pachelo?, Attorney. Pachelo experienced the following events during the organizing phase of the new business and its first month of? operation, March 2018. Some of the events were personal and did not affect the law practice. Others were business transactions and should be accounted for by the business.

Mar. 1.Sold personal investment in Amazon? stock, which she had owned for several? years, receiving $ 35,000 cash. 2.Deposited the $ 35,000 cash from the sale of the Amazon stock in her personal bank account. 3. Deposited $ 73,000 cash in a new business bank account titled Annette Pachelo?, Attorney. The business issued common stock to Pachelo. 5. Paid $700 cash for ink cartridges for the printer. 7. Purchased computer for the law? office, agreeing to pay the? account, $ 5,000?, within three months. 9. Received $2,800 cash from customers for services rendered. 15. Received bill from The Lawyer for magazine? subscription, $400. ?(Use Miscellaneous Expense? account.) 23. Finished court hearings on behalf of a client and submitted a bill for legal? services, $ 10,000?, on account. 28. Paid bill from The Lawyer. 30. Paid? utilities, $1,200. 31. Received $3,300 cash from clients billed on March 23. 31. Cash dividends of $5,500 were paid to stockholders.???

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
D Question 4 2 pts Under the Ultramares Doctrine, an accountant is liable only to those with who the accountant is in privity of contract or a privity-like relationship. O True FalseW WordCounter - Count Ward : G henn ofhitions - Googles : |0 Assignment db Paper C) Chopp The Lom of Fenkho X creader.chegg conW/bockw/978156783879Vcf /3/241/4/21402/3405:0 The pistons aproc the techalgod employed by defendant was proper, The sole basis for spending the export testimony would support a finding of sprite negligence is that the berve was injured during nitraction, Where an if orp may over dople the car. s finding of negligent onrol be pinlasted only on the fact it dil sits. Phin ill also maimains there is evidence of repligence from the fact this is beast of injury to a partof the bady not involved in the brcomment. However, that is not in. The surgical procedure did include foraction of the sissend column. It was very much in the surgical field. Third overt did are er in dingding a verdict for defendant on the issue of spotify mepigend. IL. Hes is loquite. Pontiff also alleges the appliability of the doctrine of res ipsi kopisir. Our mail recent adelmel of the doctrine appear in [a 1973eve]: Linder the destring of res ipso inquiter, where (10) injury or damage is cured by an instrumentality under the reclusive control of defendant and (2) the occurrence is rach in is to ordinary course of things would not happen if reasonable care had been med, the happening of the injury pormia, but does not compel, in inference deferalant was negligent. A The coaltest in this case consens presence of the second foundation fan [ from the quoted paragnight. Belowfart argues the wound fondation fact for pes ipss kqubar is shunt because i does not Sic in the common growledge of bymen to may injury to be larynged fever does not opour if du care is cursived in antomar appris thcervical fusion surgery. We must initially decide what his previously been an open question in this jurisdiction may the common expatend in establish the soold boundation fact for its por loqolfor be shown by expert testimony? In the qual cast the basis of pad experience from which this conclusion may be drewn is common to the community, and ba matter of general know badge, which he court neonizes on much the some bash as well likes judicial notice of But which everyone knows. It may, however, be supplied by the evidence of the parties; find expert testimony that much in event mally does not occur without negligence may send a sollicien. heis for the internet In thi cos, how it, even oumakering the expert testimony. the record at best only suppens an inference | that plaintiff suffered an extremely sure injury in anterior approach corsied fusion surgery which They ofour even when due care in exercised Kirity of the commence is not a sufficical predicte for application of new ipsi loqutor.... There is in his in the prestill case, in expert testimony or otherwise, for airing plaintill's injury is more White the result of regligence then you guy for which the defendant is roof meyersible We do not belief there was ary basis in this one for submission of reps boquot Trial can doif not er in Raining in summit it. IV. Billkey or trespass Plaintiff onlends there was also bulletcil evidence to submit the are to the jury on the theory of ballery or trespass. In effect, she illeges the comened to minion of two serieless timeusal of mahone protraded dark thinking that would by a separate opention skitional vertebrae had to be fined. Boy sens for fact four worthen wort lined combined with defendant's assurances and follows to won her of specific Defendant teaified plaintiff win fully advised is in the nature of her problem and the scope of corrective surgery. He acknowledges he did not advice her of the band of vocal chord fairy paralysis. He believed the posibility of wich onmince was puligible and cerweighed by the danger of man apprehension if waming of the risk was chan Aa 40 O14. When comparing Pearson correlations of 0.8 and 0.9, it is actually better to compare a. 0.64 and 0.81 b. 8% and 9% C. (1 - B) and (1 - 9) d. 80 % and 90%% e. 0.B and 0,9 f. none of the above 15. Which among the alternatives below, best describes the x, y data in the graph. a. no correlation present b. weak negative correlation c. a nonlinear relationship d. a cloud of points e. a strong nonlinear relationship f. strong negative correlation g. strong positive correlation h. weak positive correlation I. none of the above 16. It's a good idea to construct a scatter plot before conducting Pearson correlation analysis because a, outliers may vitiate parametric correlation b. there's no point computing correlation if points fall on a straight line C. different methods are used for positive versus negative correlation d. one should only compute correlation if there's a clear curvilinear trend e. a person's visual impression about correlation overrides statistical analysis f. none of the above 17. A visualization that allows one to estimate the relationship between two x, y paired, numeric variables of any sample size, is a a. box plot b. histogram c. strip chant d, bar graph e. violin plot f. stem-and-leaf display g. none of the above 18. When testing Pearson r for significance, the null hypothesis is a. r is large b. r-square is 95% C. r is not zero d. r is invalid e. r is small f. r is zero g. r-square is 5% h. none of the above

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Law Of Torts

Authors: Joseph W. Glannon

6th Edition

1543807690, 978-1543807691

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

An improvement in the exchange of information in negotiations.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

1. Effort is important.

Answered: 1 week ago