solve the whole question for an instant like

Profits have been decreasing for several years at Pegasus Alrlines. In an effort to Improve the company's performance, consideration Is being given to dropping several flights that appear to be unprofitable. A typical statement of profit or loss for one such flight (flight 482) Is given below (per flight): The following additional information is avallable about flight 482 : (a) Members of the flight crew are paid fixed annual salaries, whereas the flight assistants are paid by the flight. (b) One-third of the Ilability Insurance Is a special charge assessed against flight 482 because in the opinion of the Insurance company, the destination of the flight is in a 'high-risk' area. The remaining two-thirds would be unaffected by a decision to drop flight 482. (c) The baggage loading and flight preparation expense is an allocation of ground crews' salaries and depreciation of ground equipment. Dropping flight 482 would have no effect on the company's total baggage loading and flight preparation expenses. (d) If flight 482 is dropped, Pegasus Airlines has no authorization at present to replace it With another flight. (e) Depreciation of alrcraft is due entirely to obsolescence. Depreciation due to wear and tear is negligible. (f) Dropping flight 482 would not allow Pegasus Airlines to reduce the number of alrcraft In Its fleet or the number of flight crew on its payroll. Required: 1. Prepare an analysis showing what impact dropping flight 482 would have on the alrline's profits. (Remember to enter the number with a minus sign In case of decrease In profits if the flight is discontinued.) 2. The airline's scheduling officer has been criticized because only about 50% of the seats on Pegasus' flights are being filled compared to an average of 60% for the industry. The scheduling officer has explained that Pegasus' average seat occupancy could be improved considerably by eliminating about 10% of the flights, but that doing so would reduce profits. Is there any contradiction in the scheduling officer's explanation? Yes No Profits have been decreasing for several years at Pegasus Alrlines. In an effort to Improve the company's performance, consideration Is being given to dropping several flights that appear to be unprofitable. A typical statement of profit or loss for one such flight (flight 482) Is given below (per flight): The following additional information is avallable about flight 482 : (a) Members of the flight crew are paid fixed annual salaries, whereas the flight assistants are paid by the flight. (b) One-third of the Ilability Insurance Is a special charge assessed against flight 482 because in the opinion of the Insurance company, the destination of the flight is in a 'high-risk' area. The remaining two-thirds would be unaffected by a decision to drop flight 482. (c) The baggage loading and flight preparation expense is an allocation of ground crews' salaries and depreciation of ground equipment. Dropping flight 482 would have no effect on the company's total baggage loading and flight preparation expenses. (d) If flight 482 is dropped, Pegasus Airlines has no authorization at present to replace it With another flight. (e) Depreciation of alrcraft is due entirely to obsolescence. Depreciation due to wear and tear is negligible. (f) Dropping flight 482 would not allow Pegasus Airlines to reduce the number of alrcraft In Its fleet or the number of flight crew on its payroll. Required: 1. Prepare an analysis showing what impact dropping flight 482 would have on the alrline's profits. (Remember to enter the number with a minus sign In case of decrease In profits if the flight is discontinued.) 2. The airline's scheduling officer has been criticized because only about 50% of the seats on Pegasus' flights are being filled compared to an average of 60% for the industry. The scheduling officer has explained that Pegasus' average seat occupancy could be improved considerably by eliminating about 10% of the flights, but that doing so would reduce profits. Is there any contradiction in the scheduling officer's explanation? Yes No