Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Some problems about cuts. Doesn't need a formal proof, just want some ideas about how to proof these statement. Cuts are sometimes dened as subsets

Some problems about cuts. Doesn't need a formal proof, just want some ideas about how to proof these statement.

image text in transcribed
Cuts are sometimes dened as subsets of the edges of the graph, instead of as partitions of its vertices. We will sometimes go back and forth between these two denitions without making much of a distinction, so in this problem you will prove that these two denitions are almost equivalent. Let G = (V, E) be a directed graph, and let 3,15 6 V. We say that a set of edges X Q E separates s and t if every directed path from s to 75 contains at least one edge in X. For any subset S of vertices, let 6(3) denote the set of edges leaving 5', i.e., let 6(3) = {(u, v) E E : u E 5', 'U 915 S}. (b) Let (S, 3') be an (3,13) cut (i.e., .3 E S and t E 5', where 5' = V\\S). Prove that 6(3) separates .5' and t. (c) Let X be an arbitrary subset of edges that separates s and t. Prove that there is an (s, t)-cut (S, 5') such that 6(8) Q X. (d) Let X be a minimal subset of edges that separates s and t (so for all X'r Q X , we know that X ' does not separate .9 and t). Prove that there is an (s, t)-cut (S, 3') such that 6(8) = X

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Complex Variables and Applications

Authors: James Brown, Ruel Churchill

8th edition

73051942, 978-0073051949

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions