Question
Sonal Johnson is a risk manager for a bank. She manages the bank's risks using a combination of swaps and forward rate agreements (FRAs). Johnson
Sonal Johnson is a risk manager for a bank. She manages the bank's risks using a combination of swaps and forward rate agreements (FRAs).
Johnson prices a three-year Libor-based interest rate swap with annual resets using the present value factors presented in Exhibit 1.
Maturity (years) | Present Value Factors |
1 | 0.990099 |
2 | 0.977876 |
3 | 0.965136 |
Johnson also uses the present value factors in Exhibit 1 to value an interest rate swap that the bank entered into one year ago as the receive-floating party. Selected data for the swap are presented in Exhibit 2. Johnson notes that the current equilibrium two-year fixed swap rate is 1.00%.
Swap notional amount | $50,000,000 |
Original swap term | Three years, with annual resets |
Fixed swap rate (since initiation) | 3.00% |
One of the bank's investments is exposed to movements in the Japanese yen, and Johnson desires to hedge the currency exposure. She prices a one-year fixed-for-fixed currency swap involving yen and US dollars, with a quarterly reset. Johnson uses the interest rate data presented in Exhibit 3 to price the currency swap.
Days to Maturity | Yen Spot Interest Rates | US Dollar Spot Interest Rates |
90 | 0.05% | 0.20% |
180 | 0.10% | 0.40% |
270 | 0.15% | 0.55% |
360 | 0.25% | 0.70% |
Johnson next reviews an equity swap with an annual reset that the bank entered into six months ago as the receive-fixed, pay-equity party. Selected data regarding the equity swap, which is linked tot an equity index, are presented in Exhibit 4. At the time of initiation, the underlying equity index was trading at 100.00.
Swap notional amount | $20,000,000 |
Original swap term | Five years, with annual resets |
Fixed swap rate | 2.00% |
The equity index is currently trading at 103.00, and relevant US spot rates, along with their associated present value factors, are presented in Exhibit 5.
Maturity (years) | Spot Rate | Present Value Factors |
0.5 | 0.40% | 0.998004 |
1.5 | 1.00% | 0.985222 |
2.5 | 1.20% | 0.970874 |
3.5 | 2.00% | 0.934579 |
4.5 | 2.60% | 0.895255 |
Johnson reviews a 6 X 9 FRA that the bank entered into 90 days ago as the pay-fixed/receive-floating party. Selected data for the FRA are presented in Exhibit 6, and current Libor data are presented in Exhibit 7. Based on her interest rate forecast, Johnson also considers whether the bank should enter into new positions in 1 X 4 and 2 X 5 FRAs.
FRA term | 6 X 9 |
FRA rate | 0.70% |
FRA notional amount | US $20,000,000 |
FRA settlement | Advanced set, advanced settle |
30-day Libor | 0.75% |
60-day Libor | 0.82% |
90-day Libor | 0.90% |
120-day Libor | 0.92% |
150-day Libor | 0.94% |
180-day Libor | 0.95% |
210-day Libor | 0.97% |
270-day Libor | 1.00% |
Three months later, the 6 X 9 FRA in Exhibit 6 reaches expiration, at which time the three-month US dollar Libor is 1.10% and the six-month US dollar Libor is 1.20%. Johnson determines that the appropriate discount rate for the FRA settlement is 1.10%.
Based on Exhibit 1, Johnson should price the three-year Libor-based interest rate swap at a fixed rate closest to:
A. | 0.34%. | |
B. | 1.16%. | |
C. | 1.19%. |
From the bank's perspective, using data from Exhibit 1, the current value of the swap described in Exhibit 2 is closest to:
A. | -$2,951,963. | |
B. | -$1,967,975. | |
C. | -$1,943,000. |
Based on Exhibit 3, Johnson should determine that the annualized equilbrium fixed swap rate for Japanese yen is closest to:
A. | 0.0624%. | |
B. | 0.1375%. | |
C. | 0.2496%. |
From the bank's perspective, using data from Exhibits 4 and 5, the fair value of the equity swap is closest to:
A. | -$1,139,425. | |
B. | -$781,323. | |
C. | -$181,323. |
Based on Exhibit 5, the current value of the equity swap described in Exhibit 4 would be zero if the equity index was currently trading the closest to:
A. | 97.30. | |
B. | 99.09. | |
C. | 100.00. |
From the bank's perspective, based on Exhibit 6 and 7, the value of the 6 X 9 FRA 90 days after inception is closest to:
A. | $14,817. | |
B. | $19,647. | |
C. | $29,635. |
Based on Exhibit 7, the fixed rate on a new 2 X 5 FRA is closest to:
A. | 0.61%. | |
B. | 1.02%. | |
C. | 1.71%. |
Based on Exhibit 6 and the three-month US dollar Libor at expiration, the payment amount that the bank will receive to settle the 6 X 9 FRA is closest to:
A. | $19,945. | |
B. | $24,925. | |
C. | $39,781. |
Based on Exhibit 7, the no-arbitrage fixed rate on a new 1 X 4 FRA is closest to:
A. | 0.65%. | |
B. | 0.73%. | |
C. | 0.98%. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started