Source 1

My friends the simple fact of the matter is this: if we cannot make globalization work for all, in the end it will work for none. The unequal distribution of wealth, and the imbalances in global rule-making, which characterize globalization today, inevitably will produce backlash and caring only for yourself or country. And that, in turn, threatens to undermine and ultimately to unravel the open world economy that has been so painstakingly constructed over the course of the past half-century. Today, 71%, of the world's population live in countries where inequality has grown. This is especially important because inequalities within countries are the inequalities people feel day to day, month to month, year to year. (United Nations)

What is the ideological perspective(s) shown in the source?

What concepts/examples/case studies relate to this source?

How does the source relate to the principles of Historical Globalization?

Source 2

"New Corporation" Documentary

What is the ideological perspective(s) shown in the source?

What concepts/examples/case studies relate to this source?

How does the source relate to the principles of Historical Globalization?

Source 3

What is the ideological perspective(s) shown in the source?

What concepts/examples/case studies relate to this source?

The Guns, Germs and Steel documentary talked a lot about how European powers took over many countries like India, Africa, Jamaica and is reaching for Eqypt. The fact that the head is shown where England is shows they believed they were in control and had all the power.

How does the source relate to the principles of Historical Globalization?

Discussing the Relationships

Explain how the three sources interact with one another and with the issue.