Starfax, Incorporated, manufactures a small part that is widely used in various electronic products such as home computers. Results for

the first three years of operations were as follows $($absorption costing basis$)$:

In the latter part of Year $2,$ a competitor went out of business and in the process dumped a large number of units on the market. As a

result, Starfax's sales dropped by $20\%$ during Year $2$ even though production increased during the year. Management had expected

sales to remain constant at $53,400$ units; the increased production was designed to provide the company with a buffer of protection

against unexpected spurts in demand. By the start of Year $3,$ management could see that it had excess inventory and that spurts in

demand were unlikely. To reduce the excessive inventories, Starfax cut back production during Year $3,$ as shown below:

Additional information about the company follows:

a$.$ The company's plant is highly automated. Variable manufacturing expenses $($direct materials, direct labor, and variable

manufacturing overhead$)$ total only $$2\mathrm{.}00$ per unit, and fixed manufacturing overhead expenses total $$512,640$ per year.

b$.$ A new fixed manufacturing overhead rate is computed each year based on that year's actual fixed manufacturing overhead costs

divided by the actual number of units produced.

c$.$ Variable selling and administrative expenses were $$1$ per unit sold in each year. Fixed selling and administrative expenses totaled

$$142,720$ per year.

d$.$ The company uses a FIFO inventory flow assumption. $($FIFO means first$-$in first$-$out. In other words, it assumes that the oldest units in

inventory are sold first.$)$

Starfax's management can't understand why profits doubled during Year $2$ when sales dropped by $20\%$ and why a loss was incurred

during Year $3$ when sales recovered to previous levels.

Required:

Prepare a variable costing income statement for each year.

Refer to the absorption costing income statements above.

a$.$ Compute the unit product cost in each year under absorption costing. Show how much of this cost is variable and how much is fixed.

b$.$ Reconcile the variable costing and absorption costing net operating income figures for each year.

$5$b$.$ If Lean Production had been used during Year $2$ and Year $3,$ what would the company's net operating income $($or loss$)$ have been in

each year under absorption costing?

Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.

Reconcile the variable costing and absorption costing net operating income figures for each year. $($Enter any losses or deductions as a

negative value.$)$