Question
Stark Industries, a company based in Yurp, concludes a contract for the sale of a tricorder with Dream Park Pty Ltd, a purchaser based in
Stark Industries, a company based in Yurp, concludes a contract for the sale of a tricorder
with Dream Park Pty Ltd, a purchaser based in Jumbostan. Tricorders are protected
inventions under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. The
contract includes an INCOTERM - being Delivered at terminal (DAT) - which provides
for delivery in Jumbostan at Port Valeria. The offer by Stark Industries is made by email
in which its electronic signature appears. Dream Park did not sign the contract but instead
replied with an international bill of exchange ordering Which Bank to make payment in
favour of Stark Industries or to its order.
Stark Industries concludes a transport contract with Wayne Enterprises, a shipping
company based in Yurp, for the delivery of the tricorder on a ship called Fishizzle. The
contract specifies that any disputes between the parties are to resolved under "general
principles of contract law in Yurp which are common to all States". Stark Industries also
concludes an insurance contract for the transport of the tricorder on the Fishizzle with
Frobozz International, an insurance company.
Wayne Enterprises gives to Stark Industries a bill of lading which states that the tricorder
had been properly shipped on the Fishizzle. Stark Industries then concludes a transport
contract with Alchemax, an aerial transport company, to deliver that bill of lading to
Dream Park Pty Ltd. Alchemax subsequently provides an air bill which acknowledges
that the document has been received. Unfortunately, Alchemax sends that air way bill via
local mail services which causes a delay in delivery of the air way bill to Dream Park Pty
Ltd by 7 days.
It also eventuates that Wayne Enterprises transhipped the tricorder from the Fishizzle to
another ship, the Marlin Monroe. Sadly, the Marlin Monroe caught on fire after water
entered its electronic system which meant that delivery of the tricorder occurred after the
date specified in the contract. Dream Park Pty Ltd ultimately receives the bill of lading
but refuses to pay because it could not take possession of the tricorder by the due date.
Giving reasons for your answers:
(i) from which company, if any, can Stark Industries claim payment or compensation;
(ii) before which court or tribunal could Stark Industries make that claim? and
(iii) what may be the applicable law ?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started