State Automobile License Renewals Henry Coupe, the manager of a metropolitan branch office of the state department of motor vehicles, attempted to analyze the driver's license-renewal operations. He had to perform several steps. After examining the license-renewal process, he identified those steps and associated times required to perform each step, as shown in the following table: Coupe found that each step was assigned to a different person. Each application was a separate process in the sequence shown. He determined that his office should be prepared to accommodate a maximum demand of processing 120 renewal applicants per hour. He observed that work was unevenly divided among clerks and that the clerk responsible for checking violations tended to shortcut her task to keep up with the others. Long lines built up during the maximum-demand periods. Coupe also found that Steps 1 to 4 were handled by general clerks who were each paid $12 per hour. Step 5 was performed by a photographer paid $16 per hour. (Branch offices were charged $10 per hour for each camera to perform photography:) Step 6, issuing temporary licenses, was required by state policy to be handled by uniformed motor vehicle officers. Officers were paid $18 per hour but could be assigned to any job except photography. A review of the jobs indicated that Step 1, reviewing apolications forcorrectness had to uniformed motor vehicle officers. Officers were paid $18 per hour but could be assigned to any job except photography. A review of the jobs indicated that Step 1, reviewing applications for correctness, had to be performed before any other step could be taken. Similarly, Step 6 , issuing temporary licenses, could not be performed until all the other steps were completed. Henry Coupe was under severe pressure to increase productivity and reduce costs, but he was also told by the regional director that he must accommodate the demand for renewals. Otherwise, "heads would roll." Answer the following questions (Answers can be written in the text box or written or, cT paper and then scanned and uploaded): 1. What is the maximum number of applications per hour that can be handled by the present configuration of the process? Which is the bottleneck here? What is a balanced line and how it may be achieved here? 2. How many applications can be processed per hour if a second clerk is added to check for violations? 3. If the first three tasks can be successfully combined to form a new activity, without cutting down the man power, what is the maximum number of applications the process can handle? Compare it with the output achieved in step 2 and what is the advantage here? What could be the limitations of such creative rearranging and combining of tasks? 4. How would you suggest modifying the process to accommodate 120 applications per hour? What is the cost per application of this new configuration