Steven is visited by the police and questioned about a series of burglaries in the neighborhood. The police first asked Steven if he would speak with them and he agreed and invited them into his apartment. The conversation takes place over a period of about 20 minutes. During the discussion of the matter, Steven makes an incriminating statement to the police which was later used by the police in his trial on burglary charges. Steven's attorney argues at trial that his Miranda rights were violated. Is he right? Group of answer choices Yes, because this was the kind of coercive environment that Miranda seeks to address No, because Steven was not under arrest Yes, because Steven would not feel free to terminate the conversation No, because Steven was not in custody