Question
Sticky costs I was looking at a lot of data across a lot of years, companies, and industries and I noticed the following: When sales
Sticky costs
I was looking at a lot of data across a lot of years, companies, and industries and I noticed the following:
When sales increased by 10 percent, total operating expenses increased by 9 percent. When sales decreased by 10 percent, total operating expenses decreased by only 5 percent.
Maybe this pattern of total operating expenses could be described as sticky. Costs seemed to readily go up to follow sales, but costs did not decrease as readily when sales fell.
Required:
1. Why might costs be sticky? One proposal is that management is optimistic about the future and readily builds capacity for expansion and is reluctant to reduce capacity. Another, perhaps less rational thought, is that management becomes attached to the new (costly) activities and it reluctant to cut it. Finally, another less rational thought is that management engages in empire building at any opportunity and is reluctant to cut it. Feel free to select from these or suggest your own thoughts based on your experience.
2. What does this mean for our ability to build cost-volume-profit representations for the organization?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started