Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Stocks A and B have the following probability distributions of expected future returns: Probability A B 0.1 (5 %) (22 %) 0.1 5 0 0.6

Stocks A and B have the following probability distributions of expected future returns:

Probability A B
0.1 (5 %) (22 %)
0.1 5 0
0.6 11 23
0.1 19 30
0.1 32 39
  1. Calculate the expected rate of return, , for Stock B ( = 11.70%.) Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.

    %

  2. Calculate the standard deviation of expected returns, A, for Stock A (B = 16.30%.) Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.

    %

    Now calculate the coefficient of variation for Stock B. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.

    Is it possible that most investors might regard Stock B as being less risky than Stock A?

    1. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense.
    2. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolio sense.
    3. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense.
    4. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolio sense.
    5. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense.

    -Select-IIIIIIIVVItem 4

  3. Assume the risk-free rate is 2.5%. What are the Sharpe ratios for Stocks A and B? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to four decimal places.

    Stock A:

    Stock B:

    Are these calculations consistent with the information obtained from the coefficient of variation calculations in Part b?

    1. In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky than B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense.
    2. In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky than B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolio sense.
    3. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a portfolio sense.
    4. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a portfolio sense.
    5. In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a portfolio sense.

    -Select-IIIIIIIVVItem 7

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Introduction To Finance Markets, Investments, And Financial Management

Authors: Ronald W Melicher, Edgar Norton

13th Edition

0470128925, 9780470128923

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What kind of value does a typical histogram bin contain?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What are the attributes of a technical decision?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

How do the two components of this theory work together?

Answered: 1 week ago