Stomata count ANOVA table - Please make sure to pay attention to the third p-value listed (highlighted in yellow) for the interaction between plant type/condition (xerophyte, mesophyte, and hydrophyte) and leaf side (top or bottom) as this p-value is statistically significant ( <0.05). Essentially, this just shows that there is a significant difference in the amount of stomata present on the top or bottom of a leaf depending on what type of plant you are looking at. Also, you could mention that there was a slight significant difference in the stomata counts when at leaf side in general. ANOVA - Stomata Counts Post Hoc Comparisons - Condition * Side Spinach Top Spinach Bottom """B"" Bottom ""A"" Top """B"" Top Cases Condition Side Sum of Squares df 2850.195 2 10915.550 1 Mean Square F P Spinach Bottom 1425.098 10915.550 0.565 0.571 Spinach Top "A"" Top """B"" Top Spinach Top 4.326 0.041 "A"" Top """B"" Top Condition * Side Residuals 77123.382 2 176620.026 70 38561.691 15.283 < .001 Spinach Top 2523.143 ""B"" Top Spinach Top 32.729 Mean Difference prakey SE t 65.519 20.239 3.237 0.022 -60.214 18.985 -3.172 0.026 7.324 19.347 0.379 0.999 -60.514 20.798 -2.910 0.053 -27.786 18.985 -1.464 0.688 67.538 19.347 3.491 0.010 -0.300 20.798 -0.014 1.000 32.429 18.985 1.708 0.531 -67.838 21.128 -3.211 0.024 -35.110 19.347 -1.815 0.463 20.798 1.574 0.618 Note. Type III Sum of Squares Note. P-value adjusted for comparing a family of 6 Since we had a statistically significant difference in stomata counts when considering the interaction between plant type/condition (xerophyte, mesophyte, and hydrophyte) and leaf side (top or bottom), I conducted a post hoc analysis to determine which specific groups (what leaf sides on which type of plant) were different from each other. As an example, if you wanted to interpret the results from this analysis (since I know that there is a lot going on in this table), you could say that there was a statistically significant difference in the amount of stomata present on bottom side of plant A's leaf compared to the bottom side of plant B's leaf (p < 0.05). The same idea would apply to the other statistically significant results (p-values highlighted in yellow). In contrast, all of the p-values that are not highlighted means that there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the number of stomata when comparing the two groups, such as plant B bottom versus spinach top. Post Hoc Tests Standard Post Hoc Comparisons - Condition * Side Average stomata count for the peel specimens (spinach, plant A & B) bar graph 120 100 80 60 40 20 ... ""A"" Bottom """B"" Bottom Spinach Bottom "A"" Top ""B"" Top Mean Difference SE t prakey 93.305 20.239 4.610