Strict Liability. Danny and Marion Klein were injured when an aerial shell at a public fireworks exhibit went astray and exploded near them. They sued Pyrodyne Corp., the pyrotechnic

company that was hired to set up and discharge the fireworks, alleging, among other things, that the company should be strictly liable for damages caused by the fireworks display. $[$Klein v$.$

Pyrodyne Corp., $117$ Wash$\mathrm{.}2$d $1,810$ P$\mathrm{.}2$d $917(1991)]$

a$)$ Will the court agree with the Kleins? Please give reasons why the court might rule in favor of

the Kleins. $($Hint: Think about the nature of fireworks.$)$

b$)$ Why is the doctrine of strict liability good for society?

c$)$ What is a disadvantage of this doctrine of strict liability $($think of what parties are negatively

impacted by this doctrine$)?$