Students often equate the structural frame with red tape and bureaucracy and see the human resource frame as soft and simply concerned with how people feel. Sometimes the important understanding that participative (people-focused) structures are also possible outcomes of rational thinking and organizational design efforts, my get missed. Consider the ways in which the two frames are potentially complementary, not necessarily inconsistent or adversarial.

Provide an example from your own experience of how these frames can inform one another and benefit from an ability to "see" both at work in the system. What does holding both frames reveal about the system or change effort that otherwise might be missed?