Students will receive a Case Note on which to base their case analysis in response to the questions below. 1. \"that are the pros and cons of interest rate swaps? 2. Suppose you were the president of the company that employed the interest-rate swap transaction in question to hedge against interest rate risks. a. If you were presented with the same circranstances again. would you use it as a form of hedging or speculation? b. Ifyou had entered into the swap, what should the Bank have explained to you before the contract was signed? Do you believe that the Bank breached its duty of explanation or abused its bargaining position in this case? Do you think the swap agreement was fair or unfair? 3. Perform the following exercise: An interest rate swap involving two parties. DSG Corp. {056:} and Toyota Motor Corp. (Toyota) both wish to access funding at the lowest cost. While Toyota is looking to benet 'om oating-rate borrowing. 05G wants the certainty of xed-rate terms. Toyota has a better credit rating than 03G. and this allows it to access lower borrowing costs with respect to both fixed and oating rates. Toyota wants to pursue a oating-rare model that allows it to borrow at TIBOR+1%. TIE-23R. (Tokyo Interbank Offer Rate) is the base rate in Japan for floating rate loans. Given that Toyota could borrow at a xed rate of 8% for six years, it swapped its preferential rate for the floathrg rate it was looking for. On the other hand. DSG seeks a xed rate and is able to access such a rate at 12%. However. OSG is able to borrow using a oating rate ofTIBDR+2%: therefore. it can swap the oating rate for the xed interest rate. What action would you advise for a six-year swap? Assume TIBDR is 5%, although it could be any rate. Consider two options: Case 1 Split the savings evenly between the two parties: Case 2 Split the savings 2:3 for Toyota and U3 for 03G. For this analysis. use the method used in the main text of this case and what you have learnt in this coruse