Subject and Code: Hotel Management- HOST203 Lecturer/ Tutor Dr. Andrew LE Assessment Title AT1. Assessment Task 1-
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Subject and Code: Hotel Management- HOST203 | |||||
Lecturer/ Tutor | Dr. Andrew LE | ||||
Assessment Title | AT1. Assessment Task 1- Written Report (Group) | ||||
Course Learning Outcomes | Learning Outcomes 1 and 2 | ||||
Assessment Type | Written Report (Group) | ||||
Weighting | 20% | ||||
Word Limit Due date | 2000 words 11:59pm Friday, Week 5 | ||||
Submission type Format/ Layout of Assessment | Report to Turnitin drobox Business report | ||||
Assessment instructions | Prepare You knowledge Referencing examples the a will need | APA referencing written report to demonstrate research and on your chosen topic. sources and backing up your report with is a requirement. You are expected to follow style. | |||
Task | For this assessment, students are required to work in teams of 3 or 4 to choose a specific local accommodation property, preferably from an international hotel group/ chain. |
Students then prepare a report covering the systems and organisatrional structures of the chosen property/ chain. |
Grading Criteria / Rubric |
Written Report Rubric | Fail | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High Distinction | ||
Depth and credibility of research | You have not | You have | The depth and | The depth and | The depth and | ||
demonstrated that you | demonstrated that you | credibility of your | credibility of your | credibility of your | |||
have conducted | have conducted | research is above | research is very | research is | |||
enough research (eg | enough research (eg | average (based | good (based on | exceptional | |||
insufficient references | based on the number | on the number | the number and | (based on the | |||
to credible research or | of references to | and quality of | quality of your | number and | |||
peer-reviewed academic literature), and/or you have relied on doubtful sources | credible research and/or peer-reviewed academic literature), and you have relied on credible sources | your | sources) | sources) | quality of your sources) | ||
Description of the issue/problem | Your description of the | Your description is | Your description | Your description | Your description | ||
in terms of theories and | issue/problem is | accurate and | is accurate and | is accurate and | is accurate and | ||
concepts studied in this course | inaccurate and/or | demonstrates a | demonstrates an | demonstrates a | demonstrates an | ||
demonstrates a lack of | satisfactory | above average | very good | exceptional | |||
understanding of the | understanding of the | understanding of | understanding of | understanding of | |||
laws, legal principles | laws, legal principles the laws, legal | the laws, legal | the laws, legal | ||||
and concepts studied | and concepts studied principles and | principles and | principles and | ||||
(eg because of incorrect use of terminology) | concepts studied | concepts studied | concepts studied | ||||
Coherence of analysis | Your analysis is illogical and/or poorly reasoned (eg because it relies on unfounded assumptions or misunderstands the laws, legal principles and concepts applied) | Your analysis is mostly logical and well- reasoned | Your analysis is logical and well- reasoned to an above average standard | Your analysis is logical and well- reasoned to a very good standard | Your analysis is logical and wellreasoned to an exceptional standard | ||
Support for findings and analysis | Your findings or analysis are insufficiently supported by theory and/or evidence | Your findings and analysis are supported by laws, legal principles and/or evidence | Your laws, above Your above | analysis supported principles evidence standard findings and are by legal and/or to an average | Your findings and analysis are supported by laws, legal principles and/or evidence to a very good standard | Your findings and analysis are supported by laws, legal principles and/or evidence to an exceptional standard | |
Creativity | Your report lacks creativity | Your document is appropriately creative, whether in substance or format | appropriately creative standard document is to an average | Your document is appropriately creative to a very good standard | Your document is appropriately creative to an exceptional standard | ||
Use of a commercially appropriate document structure | Your document is not structured in a | Your document is well structured a | Your document is well structured a | Your document is well structured a | Your document is well structured a |
commercially appropriate manner (eg lacking relevant headings) | commercially appropriate manner (eg using relevant headings) | commercially appropriate manner to an above average standard | commercially appropriate manner to a very high standard | commercially appropriate manner to an exceptional standard | ||||
Use of academically appropriate | You have not used an | You have used an | You have used an | You have used an | You have used an | |||
document style, writing style | academically | academically | academically | academically | academically | |||
and referencing system | appropriate writing | appropriate writing | appropriate | appropriate | appropriate | |||
style and/or | style and referencing | writing | style and | writing style and | writing style and | |||
referencing system (eg | system | referencing | referencing | referencing | ||||
you have used | system to an | system to a very | system to an | |||||
colloquialisms or overly formal language or failed to use the APA referencing system) | above average standard | high standard | exceptionally high standard | |||||
Effectiveness of communication | Your written | Your written | Your written | Your written | Your written | |||
communication is poor | communication is easy | communication is | communication is | communication is | ||||
to follow | clear and succinct to an above average standard | clear and succinct to a very high standard | clear and succinct to an exceptionally high standard | |||||
|
You failed to complete the formal peer and self-evaluation form or failed to complete it adequately (eg because your comments were brief or genuine) |
Attachments:
Posted Date: