Subtle Language Changes Impact Conflict Resolution The study examining whether phrasing controversial statements using either nouns or verbs affects anger levels in conflict situations was conducted in Israel, and an example of the noun form is \"the division of Jerusalem rather than the verb form as dividing Jerusalem.\" Participants were randomly divided into two groups, where Group 1 heard statements in noun form and Group 2 heard statements in verb form. After hearing each statement, participants indicated on a 1 - 6 scale how much anger they felt, with higher numbers indicating more anger. A 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean anger rating (mean for Group 1 - mean forGroup 2) is -0.86 to -0.06. (a) Give notation for the quantity being estimated :: * . #2 HP #P HP #p P 11 + P HP P2 11 (b) Give notation for the quantity that gives the best estimate :: : H . HI P. I! ! P :: NI P PI P2 (c) Is it plausible (at a 90% level) that using the noun form or using the verb form give basically the same mean anger reactions? Use the confidence interval to answer yes or no. If your answer is no, which language form has higher mean anger levels? (d) If the answer to part (c) is no, can we determine that the language structure caused the difference in mean anger levels? (e) If you are working toward conflict resolution and want to keep levels of emotion and anger low, does it matter which type of phrasing you use, and, if so, which type of phrasing should you use?