SUMARLINS ISSUED FILED THE SHEFMAN LAW GROUP SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Lenore Rae Shefman (SBN#209485) N - 604 Mission Street, 10" Floor San Francisco, California 94105 2011 APR 27 PM 4: 1 1 BY: T: (415) 357-3681 CLERK OF THE COURT W F: (415) 357-368 Email: Lenore@CyclistLaw.com DEPUTY CLERK 4 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVID KREBS & KATHERINE KREBS D. STEPPE 6 00 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-UNLIMITED JURISDICTIONO 5 5 4 DAVID KREBS AND KATHERINE Case No. 10 KREBS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 11 Plaintiffs, Negligence, and Negligent Entrustment VS (Motor Vehicle v. Motorcycle) Amount in Controversy Exceeds $25,000 EET, 10" FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 9410 SHEFMAN LAW GROUN 14 PV HOLDINGS CORP, AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC. LISA ANN 604 MISSION STREET. 2 3( FAX. 415-357-3682 DOMINGUEZ and DOES 1 to 100, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 19 Negligence) 20 As and for a First Cause of Action, Plaintiff DAVID KREBS AND KATHERINE KREBS 21 complains of defendants and alleges as follows: 22 23 Plaintiff DAVID KREBS AND KATHERINE KREBS for all relevant periods was and is a 24 resident of the City and County of San Francisco. II 25 26 That the true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise of 27 defendants, DOE, are unknown to plaintiff who therefore sues said defendants by such fictitious 28 names. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that each of the defendants COMPLAINT. Assuming the case went to trial, and both parties conducted aiscavery, and provide written questions that were required to be answered under oath, What is this discovery tau/that was used called? . what level of the court system was this case filed and/or heard at? [State or Federal?] . When the Defendant's attorney, at trial, examines the Plaintifs), this would be considered direct or Cross examination? . when the Defendant's attorney, at trial, examines the Defendant(s) this would be considered direct or Cross- examination? . if the parties tried to resolve their dispute before going to court, and a 3''1 party was involved to guide them to a settlement, this process was likely negotiation, mediation, or arbitration? . if the parties took part in arbitration, and did not go to trial, in most instances, the arbitrator's decision would be legally binding upon them? True or False? . Arbitration is most similar to what; trial or appellate court? . In the Barnes & Noble case: https://caselaw.ndlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1675706.html. Review regarding an issue with a part of the contract: Negotiation terms, mediation terms, or arbitration terms? . A mini trial is similarto negotiation, mediation, and/or arbitration? . Review for the Canvas submission: You will need to provide and/or recognize the labels for a typical Court Structure from lawestlevel to highest level. Use these labels [not all of them may be used: US Supreme Court, Arbitration Trial Court, Judon's Court, State Appellate Court, State Trial Court, State Supreme Court, Mini Court, Federal Court System Trial's Court US Disl'ict Court State Municipal Courts State Supreme Court, Judon's Court, [10 points] l l if, I 46, Provide labels for typical ADR Structure from lowestlevel to highest level, Use only these labels: Mediation, Negotiation, Arbitration