summarize Dalglish et al. (2015) apply a power analysis to examine the policy development and implementation of integrated community case management (iCCM) for childhood illnesses in Niger. The authors utilize an iterative approach, allowing for their initial data analysis and theory review to inform their framework of power, and then reapplying that framework back to the full data set. The authors identify three main sources of powerpolitical authority, technical expertise and financial resourcesand in their analysis, identify both positive and negative uses of these forms of power in the promotion of iCCM in Niger. A key strength of this article is the richly detailed contextual analysis in which the case study is situated. For example, the authors provide a nuanced historical and political analysis, enabling readers to understand better how sources of power were able to find expression. From a policy analysis perspective, this article also highlights how different forms and expressions of power interact to shape political priorities and policy trajectories. We selected this article due to its contribution to our understanding of power and health policy analysis in LMICs; the analytic approach incorporating deductive and inductive theory on the forms of power; and its strong grounding of the