Summarize the article "Beyond Inflation Numbers: Shrinkflation and Skimpflation ". If you copy any segment of the text without paraphrasing it, you must use quotation marks ("") to indicate that the segment is a quote.

Don't forget to: Cite the source appropriately Use suitable transitional signals Include a thesis statement Include the main ideas Include a concluding sentence Use appropriate grammar and academic vocabulary.

ARTICLE:

Have you seen this month's inflation numbers? Each time new numbers are released, the words inflation and inflation rate receive attention and trend in the news. Inflation is a general, sustained upward movement of prices for goods and services in an economy. It affects purchasing power, or the amount of goods and services that a unit of currency can buy; more specifically, inflation reduces purchasing power. The most well-known measure of inflation is the consumer price index (often listed as "CPI"). This is a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services. These data are collected by a federal agency, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), and released every month. Inflation numbers are important when assessing the health of the econo- my and, in one way or another, affect everyone; they affect consumer and business decisionmaking. But it can also be helpful to think beyond inflation numbers, as business practices such as shrinkflation and skimpflation are loomingand worthy of considering. Inflation's Effects on Consumers You may not know the recent inflation numbers, but you've likely expe- rienced their results. You don't have to be an economist to understand that spending more to buy the same cart of groceries means inflation is a concern. You don't have to read the BLS's monthly report to understand that inflation erodes the purchasing power of money. You experience infla- tion each time you spend more money to buy the same cart of groceries. Inflation affects consumers' budgets and spending decisions. If consumers' personal incomes do not increase, or they increase at a slower rate than the inflation rate, then consumers aren't able to buy the same amount of goods and services they could previously. When consumers are faced with spending more to get the same amount of goods and services, they may purchase fewer items or substitute less-expensive goods and services. Inflation's Effects on Businesses Inflation also affects businesses. Businesses understand the reality of inflation when the costs of production increase and they must adjust to continue to earn a profit. Often businesses pass the higher costs of production on to consumers through higher prices. When this leads to inflation, it is referred to as cost-push inflation. For exam- ple, if the cost of transporting lettuce from California to Maine increases because fuel prices have increased, and the seller believes they can pass the extra cost along to the buyer, then the price consumers pay for lettuce at the grocery store will increase. Business Reactions to Inflation Businesses can raise prices to remain profitable when production costs increase. But they know that consumers are very conscious of price changes and may choose to buy a cheaper brand or stop buying the item completely. Businesses do not want to lose sales. For example, after increasing prices, one coffee shop owner lost nearly half their regular customers and posted the following on social media: Some have traded down and are buying coffee for $1 at the McDonald's. If [customers] can get it for a dollar for not that notable of a difference, they're going next door. One customer who had been coming in for years said he was going to start making coffee at home, so he won't be coming in here every day.1 Shrinkflation How can businesses cope with inflation and their desire to keep their customers? Businesses know that for some goods and services, consumers are more sensitive to changes in price2 than to changes in quantity, and this tendency often allows businesses to benefit from shrinkflation. Originally known as downsizing, the term shrinkflation comes from the combination of the two words shrink and inflation. Shrinkflation is when businesses reduce the size or quantity of their products while charging the same or an even higher price.3 For example: A package of bacon may look the same and sell for the same price, but instead of being 16 ounces it is only 12 ounces. Similarly, a box of cereal that used to contain 18 ounces may look the same but contain only 16 ounces of cereal. Or, a box of tissues may have fewer tissues than before when sold at the same price. The BLS treats shrinkflation as a price increase when calculating inflation numbers. It makes adjustments for changes in the size or quantity of a packaged item to ensure consumers can accurately compare prices despite the changes in size or quantity.4 Although inflation numbers take shrinkflation into account, consumers have the responsibility to notice the changes in the size or quantity of a packaged item. Consumers can easily find examples of shrinkflation at the grocery store (table). Shrinkflation varies by product and brand, which means it's important for consumers to compare products and prices in order to make wise spending decisions. Con- sumers can compare product prices by considering unit prices. A unit price changes when the ounces, pounds, or quantity of a product changes but its price remains the same or increases. For example, if a roll of paper towels is priced at $3 and has 165 sheets per roll, the unit price is $0.018 per sheet. If the package is downsized to only 147 sheets and the price remains the same, the unit price increases to $0.02 per sheet. In this instance, buying the downsized product means getting less product for the same money. Shrinkflation History Shrinkflation is not new and is not limited to times of inflation. However, when inflation is rising and businesses face rising costs, the practice increases.5 Often, changes happen over time and go unnoticed by the average consumer. For example, consumers used to buy coffee in a 1-pound can. But a 1988 report shows that the brand Chock full o'Nuts reduced the amount of their coffee in a 1-pound can to 13 ounces; by 2003, the brand had further reduced it to 11 ounces of coffee.6 Similarly, ice cream businesses used to sell their ice cream in 64-ounce containers. Then, beginning around 2008, they shrunk their containers to 48 ounces.7 Smaller-sized packages don't always mean reduced prices. Consumers usually end up paying the same for less product. Of course, the labels on packages have the weight listed, but consumers don't always read the labels or notice the changes, which become accepted. In some cases, the size and shape of containers are changed, which camouflages any reduction in the amount of a product. For example, a business might use a taller and thinner container that looks similar but holds less product: The 32-ounce Gatorade bottle was redesigned to a more aerodynamic 28-ounce size, but the price remained the same.8 Or have you noticed that little dimple on the bottom of jars of peanut butter? A slightly larger dimple means slightly less peanut butter in the jar, but most consumers do not notice the change.9 Is Shrinkflation Legal? In 1967, the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) was enacted to ensure that consumers had enough informa- tion to make an informed choice between competing products. The Act requires each package of household "consumer commodities" included in the FPLA's cover- age to have a label that includes the net quantity of con- tents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count (measurement must be in both metric and inch/pound units).10 The FPLA also states that "Packages and their labels should enable consumers to obtain accurate information as to the quantity of the contents and should facilitate value comparisons."11 So, shrinkflation is legalif busi- nesses clearly mark their products with an accurate weight that allows consumers to compare prices. Skimpflation Instead of increasing prices, businesses might decide to do something called skimpflation. Skimpflation is defined as businesses "skimping" on the quality of a product or service. Businesses skimp by spending less on services or materials to remain profitable. From NPR's Planet Money newsletter: "Skimpflation is a form of inflation.... It means we're getting less for our money."12 One example of skimpflation is when customers do more of the work. When customers do more of the work, the business provides less service. This practice is seen with the first self-service supermarketPiggly Wiggly. The first Piggly Wiggly opened in 1916 in Memphis, Tennessee. Instead of clerks behind a counter gathering products for customers, Piggly Wiggly provided carts for shoppers to go up and down the aisles to select their own items and then pay at a registerdoing more of the work that was once done by clerks. Later, starting in 1986 and as the technology developed and became cost-effective, self-checkout machines were introduced in many stores to lower stores' labor expenses. With customers doing the work at the self-checkout line, businesses skimp on service. When the cost of the tech- nology became less than the cost of labor, this newer mode of operation took root. From this beginning, some stores such as Walmart, Kroger, and Dollar General are now piloting exclusively self-checkout stores.13 Busi- nesses with self-checkout lines create a faster process for the customers, which allows the stores to have fewer workers for this process.14 Skimpflation means skimping on service by cutting costs. For example, hotels may make changes in their house- keeping services. Instead of workers cleaning guest rooms daily, their service may be reduced to every other day or when a guest checks out. This change reduces labor costs.15 There can be skimping on quality, too. Those hot, compli- mentary hotel breakfast buffets that include fresh fruit, waffles, eggs, and bacon may be replaced by prepack- aged sweet rolls and cereal. Replacing more-expensive foods with cheaper foods is a way to cut costs. And businesses may change their formulas for food products to use cheaper ingredients in these products. For example, artificial sweeteners and cheaper oils may be substituted for more expensive ingredients. Unless consumers compare the ingredients label from an older product with the new one, they won't be aware of the change when making a purchase. But businesses take a risk when switching a formula to use cheaper ingredients. If the change is noticeable to consumers and they don't like the change in taste, they may stop buying the product. Consumers may notice a change in a food's taste, but skimping on quality is harder to detect in some other products. For example, toilet tissue may be packaged the same and have the same number of sheets per roll, but it may have thinner sheets. Looking at the package, a consumer wouldn't know of that change in quality.16 Conclusion Inflation numbers are economic indicators collected and released monthly by the BLS to assess the health of the economy. But inflation is more than numbers. Consumers and businesses alike face decisions when dealing with the reality of inflation. Consumers may have to choose to spend more for necessities and less for non-essentials. Businesses may use shrinkflation or skimpflation to cover rising costs and remain profitable. With shrinkflation, it's a consumer's responsibility to read product labels and think about the unit price of products they purchase. It's the law for businesses to have information on labels about the contents of their packages, but this won't matter unless consumers read what the labels says. Skimpflation is another way that businesses deal with the reality of inflation. Consumers must consider paying the same prices for reduced quality or service when deciding what to purchase. Shrinkflation and skimpflation are a reality of inflation. Inflation num- bers provide the facts, and those numbers give consumers and businesses something worth thinking about.