summarize The court in this case determined the amount of direct damages by analyzing the evidence presented by both parties. They considered the cost of repairs to the plaintiff's property, as well as any lost profits or other economic damages resulting from the defendant's breach of contract. The court also looked at any other damages that could be directly attributed to the defendant's actions, such as the cost of rental equipment needed to complete repairs. Ultimately, the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a specific amount of direct damages based on the evidence presented. This amount was intended to fully compensate the plaintiff for the harm they suffered as a result of the defendant's actions, and was based on a careful analysis of the facts of the case