Sumo, a resident of New York, owns a warehouse in Oklahoma and operates a Web site through which Ohio residents have done substantial business with him. A dispute arises over the ownership of the warehouse with Izmit, a resident of Kentucky. Also, Lucy receives defected products from Sumo's firm. Therefore, Izmit files a suit against Sumo in Oklahoma, while Lucy has filed a suit against Sumo in an Ohio state court. In effect, Sumo has appealed to a state intermediate court of appeals, arguing that the appellate court should reverse the trial court's decision regarding Lucy's claim.

1. Identify and explain what type of jurisdiction Oklahoma does have for accepting Izmit's case.
2. Identify and explain what type of jurisdiction Ohio does have for accepting Lucy's case.
3. Identify and explain the basis of Ohio's court for accepting Lucy's case against Sumo.
4. How does court establish the requirement of a minimum contact to establish its jurisdiction?
5. What are an appellate court's options after reviewing a case?