Suppose a university has only one women's softball scholarship remaining for the coming year. The final two players that the university is considering are Allison Fealey and Emily Janson. The coaching staff has concluded that the speed and defensive skills are virtually identical for the two players, and that the final decision will be based on which player has the best batting average. Crosstabulations of each player's batting performance in their junior and senior years of high school are as follows. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Outcome Junior Senior Outcome Junior Senior Hit 15 80 Hit 75 35 No Hit 25 175 No Hit 130 85 Total At-Bats 40 255 Total At-Bats 205 120 A player's batting average is computed by dividing the number of hits a player has by the total number of at-bats. Batting averages are represented as a decimal number with three places after the decimal. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) (a) Calculate the batting average for each player in her junior year. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Calculate the batting average of each player in her senior year. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Using this analysis, which player should be awarded the scholarship? Explain. Because ---Select--- * ) had the higher batting average in both her junior year and senior year, | ---Select--- * should receive the scholarship offer.(a) Calculate the batting average for each player in her junior year. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Calculate the batting average of each player in her senior year. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Using this analysis, which player should be awarded the scholarship? Explain. Becaus v --Select-- ) had the higher batting average in both her junior year and senior year, ---Select--- * ) should receive the scholarship offer. Allison Fealey (b) Combi e data for the junior and senior years into one crosstabulation. Emily Janson(a) Calculate the batting average for each player in her junior year. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Calculate the batting average of each player in her senior year. Allison Fealey Emily Janson Using this analysis, which player should be awarded the scholarship? Explain. Because ( ---Select--- had the higher batting average in both her junior year and senior yea v ---Select--- ishould receive the scholarship offer. Allison Fealey (b) Combine or aggregate the data for the junior and senior years into one crosstabulation. Emily Janson(b) Combine or aggregate the data for the junior and senior years Into one crosstabulatlon. Calculate each player's batting average for the combined two years. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) Allison Fealey Emily Janson Using this analysis, which player should be awarded the scholarship? Explain. Because has the higher batting average over the combined junior and senior years, should receive the scholarship offer. (b) Combine or aggregate the data for the junior and senior years into one crosstabulation. Player Outcome Fealey Janson Hit No Hit Total At-Bats Calculate each player's batting average for the combined two years. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) Allison Fealey Emily Janson Using this analysis, which player should be awarded the scholarship? Explain. Becau V ---Select--- ) has the higher batting average over the combined junior and senior years, (---Select--- * should receive the scholarship offer. Allison Fealey (c) Are th Emily Janson you made in parts (a) and (b) consistent? Explain any apparent inconsistencies. The re part (a) and (b) -Sele consistent. This is an example of Sele t shows that i t in interpreting the results ba(b) Combine or aggregate the data for the junior and senior years into one crosstabulation. Player Outcome Fealey Janson Hit No Hit Total At-Bats Calculate each player's batting average for the combined two years. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) Allison Fealey Emily Janson Using this analysis, which player should be awarded the scholarship? Explain. Because [ ---Select--- * ) has the higher batting average over the combined junior and senior year ---Select--- ishould receive the scholarship offer. Allison Fealey (c) Are the recommendations you made in parts (a) and (b) consistent? Explain any apparent inconsist Emily Janson(c) Are the recommendations you made in parts (a) and (b) consistent? Explain any apparent inconsistencies. The recommendations in parts (a) and ( V --Select--- consistent. This is an example of ---Select--- 4 ) . It shows that in interpreting the results based upon separate or un-aggregated crosstabulations, the conclusion can be ---Select-- when the crosstabulation are aggregated. are not(c) Are the recommendations you made in parts (a) and (b) consistent? Explain any apparent inconsistencies. The recommendations in parts (a) and (b) consistent. This is an example \"saga... when the crosstabulations are grouped or aggregated. . aggregallon rule crosstabulation rule M It shows that in interpreting the results based upon separate or un-aggregated crosstabulations, the conclusion can be Simpson's Paradox Submit Answer conclusions paradox (c) Are the recommendations you made in parts (a) and (b) consistent? Explain any apparent inconsistencies. The recommendations in parts (a) and (b) (--Select-- ) consistent. This is an example of (---Select-- ) . It shows that in interpreting the results based upon separate or un-aggregated crosstabulations, the conclusion can be -Select-- when the crosstabulations are grouped or aggregated. the same reversed(c) Are the recommendations you made in parts (a) and (b) consistent? Explain any apparent inconsistencies. The recommendations in parts (a) and (b) consistent. This is an example of . It shows that in interpreting the results based upon separate or un-aggregated crosstabulations, the oonclusion can be when the crosstabulations are grouped or aggregated