Suppose Bad Boyz prefers to use the MACRS approach to depreciation and GOOD Girlz prefers to use the Straight-Line approach to From a " Time Value of Money" standpoint, is Bad Boyz or Good Girlz taking the smarter approach? Why? Bad Boyz: A MACRS approach provides a larger tax-break at the end of the protect. Good Girlz: A Straight-Line approach provides a larger tax-break at the end of the project. Bad Boyz, A MACRS approach provides a larger tax break at the beginning of the project. Good Girlz: Straight-Line approach provides a larger tax break at the beginning of the project. From a "Time Value of Money" standpoint, there is no difference in the two approaches