Suppose in the case of the Vintage Car Collector,

the following observation was documented: several factories in China possess the capacity to reengineer any automotive spare part.

[1] How, if at all, would that fact, if recognized by the Court, have altered the remedy associated with the case outcome?

Answer "Remedy would have remained unchanged" or "Remedy would have changed" and explain.

[2] Suppose that while any automotive spare part can be reengineered, the cost of reengineering would be a multiple of the price of a new vintage car. Would such a cost, if recognized by the court, have a bearing on your answer to [1] above? Answer YES or NO and explain. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------