Suppose that a manufacturer sells a chainsaw to a hardware store and the hardware store in turn sells the chainsaw to a consumer. The consumer is subsequently injured by the chainsaw, and sues both the manufacturer and the hardware store for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability. What is the manufacturer's best argument that it is not liable to the consumer for her injuries? Multiple choice question. By selling the chainsaw to the hardware store, the manufacturer effectively disclaimed the implied warranty of merchantability. The implied warranty of merchantability does not apply to consumer goods; instead, it applies only to commercial goods. It did not deal directly with the consumer. It was not negligent