Suppose that Catherine, an environmental engineer, sits on a government committee formed to address issues concerning sustainable energy and climate change. After informing government officials of the current status of research on these topics, Catherine then recommendsseveralregulationsthatshebelieves couldhelpmitigate environmentalproblems. Catherine warned the committee "that near-future technological advances in the areas of renewable energy (i.e. solar, wind, etc.) will generate theirownseriesofenvironmentalproblems,becausemosttechnologyproducesmorebadthan good consequences." Comment on Catherine's warning. Do you feel that her reasoning was adequate? Has she met the standard of care? Be sure to state your assumptions and explain yourreasoning.