Suppose you are an Africanist legal academic analysing the judgments in Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC) and Bhe v Magistrate Khayelisha and Others 2005 (1) BCLR. With reference to the facts and the legal issues that were raised in each case, examine what you found to be novel developments, if any; and why you consider them to be either compatible or incompatible with the idea of decolonising the South African legal system

(Oscola referencing)