Susan was driving down the freeway singing to her favorite song on the radio. While attempting to change lanes, she failed to notice George in her blind spot and clipped his car. As a result, George lost control of his car and went off the side of the freeway where his car crashed into an embankment Newman witnessed the whole accident and pulled over to assist George. Assume for this question that when Newman went to George's aid he saw that George's automobile was catching fire. He quickly ripped open the driver's side door and pulled George out of the automobile. However in doing so Newman severely cut his hand on the car's door. If Newman were to file a negligence claim against Susan, the following legal doctrine would best suit his case: a. Danger invites rescue b. Good Samaritan law Assume for this question only that while attempting to pull George from the smoldering vehicle. Newman was responsible for breaking George's ankle If George were to sue Newman for negligence. he would not prevail under the following legal doctrine: a Danger invites rescue b. Good Samaritan law Steven boarded a Japan Air fight 350, departing LAX to Tokyo tight hours after takeoff, the plane disappeared in the Pacific ocean. Despite a comprehensive investigation by both US and Japanese officials, wreckage of the plane was not found and the cause of the disappearance was undetermined. Steven's family brought a negligence cause of action against Japan Air. What legal theory would his family use to establish their case? a. Negligence per se b. Vicarious liability c. Dramshop act d. Res ipsa loquitur Roxanne is married; the mother of a 2 year old boy; and 7 months pregnant One night while at home she received a call from a person claiming to be a police officer. The person stated that her husband and son were killed in an automobile accident. Roxanne went into shock and as a result suffered a miscarriage. It turned out that the caller was a prankster and nothing he said was true. What would Roxanne's best cause of action be against the prankster? a. Intentional infliction of emotional distress b. Invasion of Privacy c Assault d. Defamation