Susie Pivac worked as a clerk for a local hospital. Pivac was fond of using her personal leave time and had gotten in trouble already for attendance issues when she was denied a personal day because she had no personal or vacation time left. Pivac then requested FMLA leave to go visit her parents in Yugoslavia because they were old. The HR director told Pivac that was no reason to take FMLA leave, though the director did instruct her on how to take FMLA leave for stress she was experiencing. Pivac went to a doctor, who gave her no treatment, no referrals, no medicine and no further appointments, though he did give her a two-week "medically excused absence" form. Pivac then took those two weeks off-..- without ever filling out and FMLA paperwork for her company. She was immediately terminated upon her return. (a) What are the key facts in this case? (b) Was the termination valid? Why or why not? (c) What is the significance of the outcome of her doctor visit